ets S.O.S Manila Bay: Save our Sunset! No to Reclamation! - Architecture Overload

Review Quizzes

EnP Review Quiz

Total Pageviews

2542816

ATLAS-CPED

Bidvertiser

Atlas-CPED

Saturday, September 1, 2012

S.O.S Manila Bay: Save our Sunset! No to Reclamation!

    1

Sunset on Manila Bay is a spectacular experience, and is free for all to enjoy. But not for long, if developers have their way.

In 1992, a group called “Manila Goldcoast Development Corp.” lobbied for approval to reclaim the entire Manila Bay waterfront along Roxas Boulevard, between the Cultural Center of the Philippines and the US Embassy. This scheme was challenged by citizens, who fought to preserve the last remaining access to the bay along Manila's historical district. The citizens won. The Manila City Council passed City Ordinance No. 7777, prohibiting reclamation in this area.

However, Goldcoast was, tragically, able to get City Ordinance No. 7777 repealed. In February 2011, City Ordinance No. 8233 reversed the prohibition. A consortium agreement was signed in April 2012 to reclaim the same waterfront along Roxas Boulevard, about 288 hectares of land, even swallowing up the Manila Yacht Club and the Philippine Navy Headquarters.

In addition to blocking the view of the sunset from Malate and Ermita, the reclamation will worsen floods, extinguish the tourism area along Roxas Boulevard, destroy the potential of our historic Intramuros, remove 20 vital anchorage berths for ships and most of all, take away from us a waterfront we all love.

No aspect of this scheme will improve the City of Manila in any discernible way — it is all for the profit of a few individuals.

We must act to protest this reclamation and prevent further destruction and loss of our heritage.

We will stop them again.

Learn more about the issue: https://www.facebook.com/savemanilabay 

Sign the petition: http://www.change.org/petitions/s-o-s-manila-bay-save-our-sunset-stop-the-reclamation-of-manila-bay Read the Goldcoast agreement with the City of Manila: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.309598825804058.65518.309364572494150&type=1Section 9.3 states, "...None of the Parties shall disclose this Agreement or its content to any third person without the other Party's written consent as required to fulfill applicable legal or regulatory requirements, including those of a stock exchange." Is the City of Manila hiding anything?

1 comment:
Write comments
  1. There is also a Phil. Ports Authority proposal to reclaim an area of Manila Bay equivalent to no less than 100 hectares for the Port of Manila Bulk Terminal(PMBT) project.

    ReplyDelete

Random Posts

  • Review Questions: History Quiz 07
    11.03.2009 - 16 Comments
    Here is a sample quiz for History of Architecture (HOA) focusing on History of Architecture in the…
  • Review Questions: History Quiz B
    11.03.2009 - 0 Comments
    Part B of History Quiz. Enjoy! For incorrect answers, click (+ show previous question). History of…
  • Master Plumber Board Exam Review for July 2024 MPLE
    30.11.2023 - 0 Comments
    ATLAS-CDC Review Center is pleased to announce the review schedule for the JULY…
  • 10 Trends Shaping the Future of Our Communities
    29.01.2009 - 0 Comments
    As we transition from a burgeoning economy to one that's rapidly deflating, people are realizing that…
  • Review Questions: Building Laws 06
    20.02.2009 - 2 Comments
    Part 6 of Building Laws Quiz on the National Building Code. Enjoy! If your answer is incorect click (+show…

ArkiReview

ATLAS_CPED ArkiReview

More Services

  • Send an Email

Blog Archive

© 2014 Architecture Overload. Designed by Bloggertheme9 | Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates
Powered by Blogger.