Here's a sample for determining the Allowable Maximum Building Footprint (AMBF) and the maximum allowable Percentage of Site Occupancy (PSO) from Rules 7 and 8 of the Revised IRR of the National Building Code of the Philippines (PD 1096).
Review Quizzes
EnP Review Quiz
Friday, May 7, 2010
AMBF and PSO
Random Posts
30.11.2023 - 0 Comments(View our other top notchers here: ALE BOARD top notchers) ATLAS-CDC Review Center announces…
27.08.2021 - 0 CommentsATLAS-CDC Review Center announces the schedule for the face-to-face review classes for…
16.03.2009 - 0 Comments"Alain de Botton contends that it is the architect's task to design buildings that contribute to happiness by…
04.12.2016 - 0 CommentsHere is a condensed version of the Architects' Guidelines: Methods of Compensation and Schedule of Fees…- 12.02.2009 - 1 CommentsHere's an updated chronology of important events over the past 58 years relative to the Regulated Profession…
%20YouTube%20Thumbnail%201280x720%20px.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
Good day Sir. Is it possible to get a copy of your sample computations (slides) for Rules7&8?I am a student of yours in the refresher course and unfortunately was not able to copy most of the problems and computation from the lecture.Thanks!
ReplyDeleteFrom where did the value 24 (length of lot) came from?
ReplyDeletethe given area is 360Sqm.. 15 is the lot frontage
ReplyDelete15 multiplied by 24 is 360.... 24 is the length of the lot while 15 is the width
sir, where did you get the 4.50m setback @ one side of the lot... as you can see R-1 residential dwellings (single detached) indicated that the frontal is 4.50 and two sides including rear-side are all 2.00m setback & has given as per the nbc. how come you used 4.50m wide setback at one side., and i think your orientation is also wrong, based on your diagram. but i would like also to thank you for this problem solving. hope you'll add some more.
ReplyDeletesir, just wanna ask, where did you get the 4.50 setback @ one side? as you can see in our nbc, R-1 residential dwellings (single detached) indicated that the frontal is 4.50m & 2 sides including rear side are all 2.00m setback only. please explain to us how did the setback on 1 side became 4.50. is it because the lot is at corner?? its not indicated at our nbc sir. but anyway i also like to thank you for this problem solving, hope you'll add some more.
ReplyDeletesir, just wanna ask, where did you get the 4.50 setback @ one side? as you can see in our nbc, R-1 residential dwellings (single detached) indicated that the frontal is 4.50m & 2 sides including rear side are all 2.00m setback only. please explain to us how did the setback on 1 side became 4.50. is it because the lot is at corner?? its not indicated at our nbc sir. but anyway i also like to thank you for this problem solving, hope you'll add some more.
ReplyDeleteif its a corner lot, the sides fronting the two RROW would both have the larger setbacks. Its stated in Table for TOSL of the NBC.
ReplyDeletesir, post a sample problem for GFA, TGFA, ISA and USA. please.
ReplyDelete